1 Comment
User's avatar
weedom1's avatar

The main device used to support claims that various birth control is not abortive has been to redefine pregnancy to start at implantation rather than fertilization. By this means the human embryonic development from single cell to blastocyst is entirely cancelled for all who did not study developmental biology.

To suggest that any IUD successfully accomplishes all prefertilization and preimplantation mechanisms is either incredibly naive, or just craven profiteering. The device is in contact with, and is disruptive of endometrial integrity, in addition to whatever actions its drug payload might have. Therefore it can act to dislodge an embryo even during or after implantation.

And any birth control that adversely the transport of the embryo through the fallopian tubes to the uterus, or affects implantation, or affects endometrial integrity is operating to stop the life of the human embryo.

Instead of denying many of the drug and device mechanisms, or pretending they don't happen, why not honestly state that the early human embryo is not important in relation to the money and the lifestyle that might be interrupted if he or she is allowed to grow??

(Europeans are so much more honest about these matters than Americans. )

Non-science runs rampant, and has been causing medical and science communities and literature to retract and implode.

Expand full comment